|
|
Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). | | \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). |
| </math> | | </math> |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Related Tags and Sections == | | == Related Tags and Sections == |
Revision as of 20:43, 1 March 2011
LDAUTYPE = 1 | 2 | 4
Default: LDAUTYPE = 2
Description: LDAUTYPE specifies which type of L(S)DA+U approach will be used.
- LDAUTYPE=1: The rotationally invariant LSDA+U introduced by Liechtenstein et al.[1]

- and is determined by the PAW on-site occupancies

- and the (unscreened) on-site electron-electron interaction

- where |m⟩ are real spherical harmonics of angular momentum L=LDAUL.
- The unscreened e-e interaction Uγ1γ3γ2γ4 can be written in terms of the Slater integrals
,
,
, and
(f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially
).
- In practice these integrals are therefore often treated as parameters, i.e., adjusted to reach agreement with experiment in some sense: equilibrium volume, magnetic moment, band gap, structure. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on-site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, U and J (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). U and J are sometimes extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations.
- These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment):
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
- |
-
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
-
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
- The essence of the L(S)DA+U method consists of the assumption that one may now write the total energy as:

- where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the L(S)DA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy
, which supposedly equals the on-site L(S)DA contribution to the total energy,

- LDAUTYPE=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the LSDA+U, introduced by Dudarev et al.[2]
- This flavour of LSDA+U is of the following form:
![{\displaystyle
E_{\mathrm{LSDA+U}}=E_{\mathrm{LSDA}}+\frac{(U-J)}{2}\sum_\sigma \left[
\left(\sum_{m_1} n_{m_1,m_1}^{\sigma}\right) - \left(\sum_{m_1,m_2}
\hat n_{m_1,m_2}^{\sigma} \hat n_{m_2,m_1}^{\sigma} \right) \right].
}](/wiki/index.php?title=Special:MathShowImage&hash=1ece621e0b4557170839aeb53ee52ed9&mode=mathml)
- This can be understood as adding a penalty functional to the LSDA total energy expression that forces the on-site occupancy matrix in the direction of idempotency,
.
- Real matrices are only idempotent when their eigenvalues are either 1 or 0, which for an occupancy matrix translates to either fully occupied or fully unoccupied levels.
- Note: in Dudarev's approach the parameters U and J do not enter seperately, only the difference (U-J) is meaningfull.
- LDAUTYPE=4: same as LDAUTYPE=1, but LDA+U instead of LSDA+U (i.e. no LSDA exchange splitting).
- In the LDA+U case the double counting energy is given by,

Related Tags and Sections
LDAU,
LDAUL,
LDAUU,
LDAUJ,
LDAUPRINT
References
Contents